Peer Assessments and Improvements

The peers i have asked said the following about my film;

-the different usage of shots was a good way to show the fear of the main character
-the usage of the lower placed shot angled up as the murderer appears is a good way for the audience to feel the same fear as the other character
-POV shots allow the viewer to see the reaction of the male as his murderer approaches
-the high pace of cross cutting - the quick changes- allow the viewer to see that it is a high paced film and with there being short shots, the adrenaline from the characters affects the viewer and also makes them feel scared.

Improvements;
I have been told by my peers that what is lacking in my film is titles, of director/ producer/ writer/ actors. i have now put those into action and placed them throughout the shots, you can see this is you refer to my last post. Also, seen as i had not finished filming when i put up the moving image storyboard, so i was not able to show the last two scenes. these last two scenes explain the story a bit better, and also shows the title and producer. Also, i have yet to include sound, such as a low beat progressing getting closer with the character. These improvements made should put me up to Band 4.